Showing posts with label abusive tax shelters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abusive tax shelters. Show all posts

Captive Insurance Buyer Beware





 Expert Witness Directory



     By Lance Wallach, 
 Abusive Tax Shelter, Listed Transaction, Reportable Transaction Expert Witness


Is a captive insurance cell the way to go? - Accounting Today - Captive Insurance: Achieve large tax and cost reductions by renting a “CAPTIVE”. Most accountants and small business owners are unfamiliar with a great way to reduce taxes and expenses. By either creating or sharing “a captive insurance company”, substantial tax and cost savings will benefit the small business owner.

Over 80% of Fortune 500 companies take advantage of some kind of captive insurance company arrangement. They set up their own insurance companies to provide coverage when they think outside insurers are charging too much, or coverage is simply unavailable. The parent company creates a captive so that it has a self-financing option for buying insurance. The captive then either retains the risk of providing insurance or pays reinsurers (companies that reinsure insurers) to take the risk.

If you buy insurance from a standard insurance company, your money buys a service, but the money is spent and gone forever. When you utilize or “rent a captive”, your money buys a service but it is invested with a good possibility of a return.

In the event of a claim, the company pays claims from its captive or from its reinsurer. To keep costs down, captives are often based in places where there is favorable tax treatment and less onerous regulation (i.e. Vermont, South Carolina, and Bermuda).

Optimum utilization of a captive by a small business, medical practice, or professional.

The best way for a small business, medical practice, etc., to take advantage of captive benefits is to share or rent a large captive. You can significantly decrease your costs of insurance and obtain tax deductions at the same time. There are, as well, significant tax advantages to renting a large captive as opposed to owning a captive.

The advantages of “renting a captive” become apparent when you consider that the single parent captive may be forced to use less than adequate standards or marginal service so they can meet the financial requirements associated with the initial general licensing and administrative costs of establishment. Additionally, when renting a large captive, the captive bears the burden of initial capital commitment and protects reinsurers from runaway claims and unnecessary losses through their underwriting protocols and claims management practices, all at significant savings to the small business owner.

Other advantages include low policy fees and no capital responsibilities to meet solvency requirements or annual management and maintenance costs. By renting a large captive, you only pay a pro rata fee to cover all administrative expenses for the captive insurance company. Another significant advantage of renting a large captive is the ability to take a loan. It is illegal for an individual captive to make loans to subscribers. When renting a large captive, however, the individual subscriber has no ownership interest, and this difference makes it legal for a rented captive to make loans to individual subscribers. So you can make a tax deductible contribution, and then take back money tax free. Operation of an individual stand alone captive insurance company may not achieve the type of cost savings that a small business could obtain by renting a large captive. To rent a large captive, your company simply fills out some forms. Renting a captive requires no significant financial commitment beyond the payment of premiums.

Buyer Beware

As with many strategies to enjoy tax savings and advantages, you must to do this correctly. IRS and other problems have happened, in the past, to those that have done this improperly or abusively. You probably want to work with a large captive that already has over fifty million in assets and is being rented by at least 200 different companies. Also, you’ll not want to own or control any part of the captive. As an unrelated party, you can more likely significantly decrease your cost of insurance, eliminate capital requirements, and minimize maintenance costs.

You want to deal with a large captive that meets the risk shifting requirements of IRS Revenue Ruling 2005-40. Be cautious about setting up your own small captive. In addition to all the costs, a small captive may find that the expense of defending itself from regulatory oversight is much greater than any benefits received.

 Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for more than 50 publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered” and others. Lance has written numerous books including “Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams,” published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s “CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation,” as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including “Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots.” As an expert witness Lance's Side  has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxadvisorexpert.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.



While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer. For specific technical or legal advice on the information provided and related topics, please contact the author.

Captive Insurance

Just a few years ago, captive insurance companies were a hot news item in the arcane world of abusive tax shelters. Sleazy promoters were signing up small businesses in droves. If you created a cell captive as a property and casualty loss management tool, it’s probably legitimate. If you “bought” an off the shelf captive from a promoter who promised tax savings, there is a good chance you own an abusive tax shelter.
After the initial wave of fraud and audits, many of the bad promoters went away. New reports suggest that captives are again making a comeback. And with the next generation of captives will come the inevitable fraudsters looking to catch a free ride on the resurgent popularity of these products.
The new wave of captive insurance companies are sometimes called cell captive insurance companies or “group captives.” We have also seen them called rent-a-captive, segregated account companies, segregated portfolio companies and incorporated protected cell companies. Whatever they are called, if properly set up they can be completely legal and valuable risk management tool.
The IRS issued a bulletin in 2008 to give guidance on these products including whether premiums can be deductible as insurance costs. The IRS says there must be adequate risk shifting and distribution to be considered “insurance.”
The scam promotions typically offer to shelter a large sum of money by calling it an insurance premium. The premium is usually the same dollar amount as the deduction you seek. The promoter offers “insurance” on a highly improbable risk. Hurricane insurance in Nebraska, anyone? Magically, you get a big deduction and in a few years you are promised the ability to get back your money in the form of a “premium refund” or dividend. Sound familiar? You probably purchased an abusive tax shelter.
If you think that you have one of these products, seek legal help immediately. First, the premiums in bogus captive insurance companies or cell captives are not deductible. That has significant tax implications and likely involves big civil penalties too.
Because the IRS views many of these schemes as abusive tax shelters, there are special penalties that apply. If the IRS finds that your captive insurance resembles an illegal welfare benefit scheme (sometimes called 419 or 412 plans), your plan might be considered a listed transaction subject to penalties of $100,000 or more per year.
Abusive tax shelters can also be criminally prosecuted.
Another danger is that in many of the cell captive frauds, the money is simply not there when you go to cancel the policy and seek a refund of premiums.
It’s not always promoters who sell the bad plans. We know of otherwise honest insurance agents and even accountants who were roped into selling these products. Many promoters lure agents into their scheme by offering legitimate looking “legal” opinion letters and slick marketing materials. If an agent or accountant sold or recommended the plan, you may still be able to recover your damages if the promoter – and your money – is long gone. (Insurance agents love these plans because they usually pay above average commissions – another red flag.)
According to a recent story in Captive Review, Bahamian cell captives have “risen from extinction” and are making a dramatic resurgence. Cell captives are currently offered in Guernsey, Jersey, Malta, Gibraltar, Isle of Man, Bahamas, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, Anguilla and Dubai. In the United States, they may be offered in Nevada, Washington, Montana, Hawaii, Kentucky, South Carolina and Oklahoma. Because they can be created in certain states doesn’t mean they pass IRS muster, however.
Whatever you do, don’t wait until the IRS finds you or until you discover that your premium refund isn’t coming. If you have questions about your cell captive or captive insurance company, give us a call. We also represent owners of phony welfare benefit plans, 419 and 412 plans. Our tax and fraud lawyers can help you determine if your cell captive or other plan is legitimate and if not, unwind the transaction and get back your hard earned money.

IRS attacks 412i scams.

Lance Wallach

I spoke at the American Society of Pension Actuaries national convention in Washington in Oct, 2002 about plans, as did the IRS chief actuary. People were warned of IRS attention to these abusive plans. After I spoke I was invited to the IRS headquarters where I addressed IRS senior officials. Treasury dept officials were also listening on speakerphones. We discussed problems, and the IRS future action against abusive plans. Within a few years IRS developed task forces that started to audit abusive plans.

Below is an article published in 2003 that I did not author about the 2003 ASPA convention.

Pending Guidance on 412(i) Plans Discussed at ASPA Convention - November 3, 2003
The IRS discussed pending guidance on fully insured defined benefit pension plans under §412(i) at its "Aggressive Practices" session last week at the annual American Society of Pension Actuaries (ASPA) conference in Washington, D.C. 
The Treasury/IRS reiterated its concerns relative to the aggressive marketing of policies to fund 412(i) plans with "springing" cash value schemes (as previously addressed in IRS Notice 89-25) and atypically high death benefits that exceed the incidental life insurance limits.  These issues were discussed in detail in our March 28, 2003 article: 412(i) Plan: A "Dream" or "Nightmare" for the Small Business Owner? Which was referenced in the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (TE/GE) Advisory Committee Report on Abusive Tax Shelters released on May 20, 2003 (also view IRS Recognizes Milberg Consulting as Pension Compliance Advocate).
The pending guidance is expected to identify abusive, or potentially abusive 412(i) plan designs.  These abusive arrangements will likely be designated as "listed transactions" under tax shelter rules.  The IRS representatives at the conference made it clear that the pending guidance is not intended to affect those properly designed 412(i) plans that are funded with conventional life insurance contracts (absent "springing" cash values and atypically high death benefits).
The really bad news for those who have adopted a plan funded with policies that fall under this scrutiny is that the pending guidance is expected to be retroactive.
Commentary
  Let's face the facts... all of the schemes involving the sale of life insurance products that attempt to take advantage of the "loopholes" in the laws governing qualified retirement or welfare benefit plans were created to make the cost of life insurance more palatable to the consumer, typically the owners of small businesses.  Each and every one of these imprudent schemes in the past 20 years involving VEBAs (§501(c)9), the so-called "pension rescue or pension crush plans," §419 plans, life insurance sub trusts and most recently, §412(i) plans are eventually shut down by the IRS.
We are mindful that our view is biased in that we earn our living by providing plan design and compliance services associated with traditional defined benefit and defined contribution plans on a fee for service basis.  We also believe that most business owners have legitimate needs for life insurance, and that a life insurance contract created by reputable company and sold by a reputable agent can serve as an invaluable planning tool for the small business owner.
As to those §412(i) plans which in theory fit within the pending IRS guidance, we simply do not believe that most life insurance agents and their home offices have the expertise to determine if a defined benefit pension plan in any form or fashion is the appropriate plan type for their small business clients.   We routinely receive calls from referring professionals inquiring relative to the applicability of a defined benefit plan for their small business clients.  In the vast majority of instances, a defined benefit pension plan is simply not the proper solution. 
The one thing for certain about the future is that it brings change.  Therefore, the potential for change in the owner's desire for tax-sheltered benefits is a reality that must be considered during the planning process.  In the context of a traditional defined benefit plan, a change of this nature could lead to a cutback in benefits to mitigate plan costs.  It might even necessitate the termination of the plan resulting in a distribution of the owner's accrued benefit into an IRA.  In the context of a fully insured defined benefit pension plan under §412(i), changes in the plan's benefit structure or plan termination could leave the small business owner with the continued expense to maintain a superfluous life insurance policy or an unanticipated taxable event.
Using a §412(i) plan in the context of an owner only business with a legitimate need for the death benefit protection provided by life insurance may be an appropriate place for this plan type.  However, we believe that until such time that the uniform estate tax credit is unlimited (which is currently subject to change), a traditional defined benefit plan along with a conventional life insurance policy held within an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT) is a more prudent choice for the small business owner.  While this plan design may cost more than a 412(i), it provides the small business owner with a significantly higher probability for a positive outcome and the flexibility to address change in the future.
Bottom Line:  In theory the §412(i) plan provides a small business owner with a retirement plan that provides significant benefits on a tax deductible basis absent the complications typically associated with a traditional defined benefit pension plan.  In reality, this plan type is rarely appropriate for owners of small businesses.

 Lance Wallach, CLU, ChFC, CIMC, speaks and writes extensively about financial planning, retirement plans, and tax reduction strategies.  He is an American Institute of CPA’s course developer and instructor and has authored numerous best selling books about abusive tax shelters, IRS crackdowns and attacks and other tax matters. He speaks at more than 20 national conventions annually and writes for more than 50 national publications.  For more information and additional articles on these subjects, visit www.vebaplan.com, www.taxlibrary.us, lawyer4audits.com or call 516-938-5007.



The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

Reportable Transactions- Help from the Experts




The IRS might be ready to levy a $50,000 tax penalty on your business for not properly reporting certain transactions to the IRS.

Learn more from the leading experts on IRS Reportable Transactions, Listed Transactions, code Sec 79 plans and other retirement & benefit plans for which the IRS is assessing large penalties for not filing the required IRS reporting forms by visiting our blog and website



Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, financial and estate planning, and abusive tax shelters.  He writes about 412(i), 419, and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio's All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education's CPA's Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxlibrary.us
The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

How to Beat the IRS -Helpful Article

How to Beat the IRS -Helpful Article

Get a $200,000 IRS Fine and Have Your Client Sue You.

Get a $200,000 IRS Fine and Have Your Client Sue You.

Dont Give the IRS Every Last Drop

Dont Give the IRS Every Last Drop

Business Owners and Accountants Fined by IRS and Don't Know Why

Business Owners and Accountants Fined by IRS and Don't Know Why

Finance Experts .org

Finance Experts .org

IRS Audits Focus on Captive Insurance Plans - Lance Wallach

IRS Audits Focus on Captive Insurance Plans - Lance Wallach

▶ Tax Expert Lance Wallach Speaking at Attorney CPA Convention - Video Dailymotion

▶ Tax Expert Lance Wallach Speaking at Attorney CPA Convention - Video Dailymotion

Defend Against IRS Penalties, Audits, Tax Shelters, Plans - Video Dailymotion

Defend Against IRS Penalties, Audits, Tax Shelters, Plans - Video Dailymotion

Blogger: User Profile: lance wallach

Blogger: User Profile: lance wallach

The IRS looks at captives and often audits them. Below are a few ideas about captives.




Lance Wallach


Successful captive programs have some or most of the following attributes. Some can be planned for at inception, while others need to be managed and realized over time. Success factors include:
1. Spread of risk with predictable losses – Successful captive owners focus on the risks they understand best – their own – and avoid the temptation to compete against commercial insurers. Successful captives also can enjoy a favorable risk spread either by having a sizeable exposure base or by incorporating a number of lines of coverage with limited correlation.
2. Good loss experience and control -- The success of a captive program can only be as good as its underlying loss experience. The best way to manage underwriting results is via targeted and rigid loss control and safety programs. Poorly managed risk programs are probably better insured by the commercial markets, no matter how over-priced the market might appear.
3. Fronting and reinsurance support -- Some captive programs cannot operate or grow without adequate fronting and/or reinsurance support. Accordingly, captive owners should look to identify fronting insurers or reinsurers with whom they can partner even if the affiliation might mean paying slightly more in any given year. It is important that the front or reinsurer be there through both good and bad years.
4. Financially stable parent(s) -- Most successful captive programs have financially sound parent(s) or insured’s that are able to pay the premium for the risk insured each year and provide additional capital for growth or to weather bad years. A captive should not be viewed as a piggy bank that can be plundered whenever a new pet project comes along or to subsidize other divisions when they experience difficulties.
5. Credible non-tax business purpose -- Successful captives are formed for true and identified risk management reasons. Those formed solely for tax reasons rarely survive over time. Tax benefits, if any, should be viewed as a bonus.
6. Strong business partners -- Since captive owners are seldom proficient in the business of insurance, very few captives are self-managed. It is crucial that a prospective captive owner retain strong business partners who possess both industry knowledge of the captive’s parent as well as a good understanding of the captive industry and how it is evolving. Business partners should be innovative and focused solely on the success of the captive itself.
7. Long-term commitment – The captive should be managed and viewed as an ongoing entity. Depending upon the lines of coverage insured, the success of a captive may not be quantifiable for five or ten years – perhaps longer. The long-term view can be difficult to master given the often-narrow business focus that demands meeting next quarter’s budget targets.
8. Positive financial return -- While many captive programs are primarily cost centers, they should be evaluated constantly against the benefits they provide to the organization as a whole. Only captive programs with positive financial returns will achieve full upper-management support and be allocated the resources needed to reach their full potential.
9. Continuous evaluation -- The captive should be evaluated regularly to ensure efficient management of retained risk across the enterprise. Often, risks originally retained by the captive may be more economically insured by commercial markets. Alternatively, risks previously deemed non-existent or minor may be ideal for the captive.
10. Be prepared for an IRS audit. Check the history of the people that want to help you with the captive. If they have sold other programs, like 412i, 419 or other abusive tax shelters do not use them.

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit http://www.taxadvisorexpert.com.




The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.